"How The World Sees Russia"

Issue #21: 08/18/2018

From the Publisher:

This week’s Rossiya Scan is filled with more our favorite topics. Starting with the Russian foreign policy ‘playbook’. The one that we believe to be the strongest in today’s growingly anarchic world. We begin by taking a look at the South China sea conflict and Russia’s growing role within it.

As stated in issue #18 of Rossiya Scan, Russia has been fomenting friendships with 3 of the 6 quarreling parties with much success. With the Philippine’s attempts to purchase Russian submarines we now see the first serious hurdle to this growing relationship. The U.S is a traditional ally of the Philippines and has voiced concern over these purchases. Hence, the fight for influence by both powers in this country is likely to heat up, and by default in the conflict as a whole. We further analyze the current state of Russia’s relationships between all 6 parties in the conflict, and try to forecast how they will do with the remaining 3 countries that they have not shown visible overtures towards.

We then move on to Russia’s attempts to strengthen its position as military arms provider, specifically in the Middle East. Russia is looking to further consolidate its role by trying to provide various countries with their SAM’s S400.The latter are considered by many to be the premium SAM systems in the world. Russia is attempting to sell them to countries that are traditional allies of the U.S. This system is giving Russia an upper hand in world geopolitics, and we do our best to describe how.

Finally, we finish by looking at the Russian economy. By showcasing again, the undervalued nature of Russian equities and by taking a look at how Russian tycoons are starting to plan the transfer of their wealth to their offspring. The latter are a new (and perhaps more western) Russian generation that will likely over time carve out its own approach to business, and politics.

-Rossiya Scan

The South China Sea Heats Up

In issue #18 of Rossiya Scan, we took a gander at Russia’s ongoing moves in the Asia-Pacifc region. Their strong foreign policy playbook is being executed in this part of the world with much success despite the existence of some serious competition from both regional and global powers.

So, who are the competing powers in the South China Sea? And why are they competing for this body of water?

The nations of China, Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia, Taiwan and the Philippines all have claims to the South China Sea. Specifically, over the rights to exploit the region's possible reserves of oil and gas. Freedom of navigation within the sea is also a point of conflict. The United States and France, have been sending naval patrols through the contested region to make the point that these are international waters. France holds the largest exclusive economic zones in the world (EEZ), and the United States has the second largest. By allowing China to simply take this without a fight, both France and the United States stand to lose a lot. Essentially by setting a precedent that has the potential of endangering their dominance in this field.

The fact the China is even building artificial islands where there were none further complicates the matter, and adds dimensions previously unthought-of.

As stated in issue #18, Russia has increasingly turned eastward as its relationship with the West deteriorates. They are looking for new trading partners, and allies to strengthen their global position. There are two basic strategies that Russia is successfully using to build such an influence, and find new partners across the globe. One is to look at places that have essentially been abandoned, and are in need of new allies (e.g. what Russia has done in the Central African Republic, as we have discussed in issue #10 and #20), or to step into places of conflict and become a friend or frenemy to as many quarreling parties as possible (e.g. what Russia has done in the Middle East).

So, what’s Russia doing in the South China Sea? It looks like we are witnessing a similar strategy to their approach in the Middle East, with some elements of Central Africa. Russia is beginning to deepen its relationship with 3 of the quarelling parties. These are China, Vietnam and the Philippines.

China and Vietnam are nothing new for the largest descendant of the Soviet Union. Both communist nations have had a long history of purchasing Russian made weapons, and of alliances with the Soviet Union. Russia has also strengthened its relationship with both aforementioned countries by signing military roadmap cooperation agreements in 2017 and 2018 respectively.

The growing relationship between the Philippines and Russia is an interesting case. One where Russia is stepping into a country that has traditionally aligned itself with the United States. Most recently, Manila has explained their desire to purchase Russian submarines. These underwater beasts of war are becoming increasingly important in this seascape saber-rattling conflict

Since 1991, 4 of the 6 parties with claims in the South China Sea have purchased at least 2 attack submarines. Taiwan and Malaysia have a total of 2 submarines, while Vietnam 6. China dwarfs all with 73, including a dozen or so nuclear submarines. The Philippine’s does not want to be left behind. Hence, they are in the market for submarines. According to Manila, the reason behind the potential Russian purchase has to do with quality.

“Why did you not stop the other countries in Asia? Why are you stopping us? Who are you to warn us?" said Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte during an event in his hometown of Davao, according to Busines Insider. "You give us submarines, [which] will implode."

Duterte further added that the U.S. had sold them used and faulty weaponry before. Referencing a series of helicopters whose poor condition allegedly led to the deaths of Philippine soldiers.

The U.S. is worried though and has said that such purchase would be detrimental to  the current U.S.-Philippine alliance. Duterte has already made other overtures to Beijing to Moscow, and is distancing himself from the U.S. Most likely because he wants a better deal, and is unsatisfied with the current state of relations between Manila and Washington D.C. 

“I don’t think that’s a helpful thing to the (US-Philippine) alliance and ultimately I think we can be a better partner than the Russians,” said Randall Schriver, U.S Assistant Secretary of Defense for Asia and Pacific Security Affairs in a press-conference the U.S. embassy in Manila. “We’ll be a good ally … there should be no misunderstanding or lack of clarity on the spirit and the nature of our commitment.”

For now, the fight is on though. Duterte is looking towards Russia and the U.S is fighting back. If the U.S. does not provide the Philippine’s with what they want they will likely begin to trade White House for the Kremlin.  It’s the first hurdle for Russia, and one that they can overcome through simple salesmanship.

Who will Russia court next though in this conflict? No word yet on their moves on Brunei, Taiwan or Malaysia. That being said, it’s likely they will maintain a focus on Brunei and Malaysia before Taiwan. With the former two, Russia already has cordial relationships, and has expanded its bilateral trade with each over time. Malaysia has quietly been growing its science, cultural and even military relationship with Russia for the past decades. Brunei less so, but it has at least on the diplomatic front, and through trade. The sultanate is also a fellow petrostate, and by default has many similar national interests to Russia.

With Taiwan, Russia’s overtures are unlikely to go so smoothly. This is because Taiwan is one of the region's biggest allies of the United States. China would also disapprove immensely of them courting the island that they see as a renegade province. That being said, Russia does have trade with the island, and it could surprise us with their diplomatic finesse. They are after all the only country that has managed to build friendships with everyone in the Middle East.

Read more: 

"U.S will be a 'Good Ally' to Philippine's if China Invades," by AFP staff. 

"The Philippine President Does Not Want U.S Submarines," by Ryan Pickrell for Business Insider. 

"Russia May Provide Philippine's with First Submarine," by Duncan DeAeth for Taiwan News. 

"Armed Clash in the South China Sea," by Bonnie S. Glaser for the Center of Preventive Action. 

Picture

SAM’s…From Russia With Love…

William Shakespeare once said: “It is better to be king of your silence, than slave of your words.” Russian President Vladimir Putin once said something similar: “We must stop using the language of force and return to the path of civilized diplomatic and political settlement.” We can notice through this statement that “Vlad” is king of his words and remains Tsar of his silences. In order to ensure that Russia to maintains an upper hand military, the Russian military has developed a missile system that completely upsets the arms balance to the holder of these missiles. Allowing Russia to “return” to the path of civilized diplomatic and political settlement, but under its own terms.

SAM’s (surface to air missiles) are crucial in deterring enemies to venture into a nation’s airspace, making an aggressor think twice before it strikes. Russia has developed the mother of all SAM’s and is using it to further divide and create friction in the Middle East (even though they have befriended all sides), generate doubts between all sides, whilst making billions of dollars in the process, and at the same time fulfilling its political agenda in the region.

The S400 is a game changer, it’s an upgrade of the Russian S300 which has been a huge success. The S400 is here to dispute the Patriot missile (manufactured by the U.S), which has been flooding armies globally, challenging the Russian S300 for decades. A quick snapshot contrasting the Patriot Missile with the S400: Patriots can detect airborne systems at 180km and hit them at 130km, the S400 detects at 600km and hits at 400km respectively. The minimum range of the Patriot is 10km and S400 2km, the Patriot can hit a target moving at a speed of 7.920km and the S400 at 17.280km; and finally, the Patriot from travel to combat mode takes 25 minutes, whilst the S400 takes 10minutes.

Presently, many countries in the Middle East and around the globe are in line or negotiating with Russia the purchase this missile defense system. These, include China, India, Syria, Egypt, U.A.E, Bahrain, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, amongst others.

The Saudis (even though in good terms with the Russians) are furious with Russia for their commitment to sell the S400 to their archenemy Qatar, whom they have imposed a blockade since June 5, 2017. To the point where King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, asked French President Emmanuelle Macron to unsuccessfully interfere in the sale of these the S400 to Qatar. Israel has spoken up, threatening an invasion of Syria if these weapons were sold to Bashar Al Assad’s government. However, the most deceitful move here, is selling them to Iran under a different name/model then the S400. All regional “friends” are receiving the weapons from the same supplier, but concerned of the outcome from the different recipients.

Greece and Bulgaria (NATO members) already use the S300 system with the intention to upgrade to S400, but the greatest concern to the West is Turkey’s intentions to purchase the S400 missile system. Turkey is a key NATO member (according to Putin, an organization with hostile intentions to Russia), and recently placed an order to purchase 100 F-35 strike fighters from the U.S. The latter deal has been put on hold as result of Turkey’s ongoing plan to purchase S400 system.

All in all, once again Putin is further dividing his newfound playground in the Middle East through this missile system, creating conflict between his allies, and NATO. The latter has always been a concern to him, and in the Middle East he now has a new bargaining chip can be used to his advantage.

Read more:

“Liberman: Israel would destroy Syrian S-300 if it attacked our jets,” by Judah Ari Gross for the Times of Israel

“Russia's S-400 Is Way More Dangerous Than You Think,” by Stephen Bryen for the National Interest

“Iran May Have the S-400 in All But Name; What Russia Really Delivered in 2016 and Why it Matters,” by Military Watch Magazine
“Russia might sell S-400 systems to US if Americans feel insecure,” by Russia Today

“How Russian arms sales help to keep the Gulf divided,” by Bill Law for Middle East Eye

Picture

There Are Good Deals in Russia...

Baron Rothschild stated during the Parisian riots of 1870: “When there is blood on the streets, buy real estate.” Quite a similar reasoning could be applied to financial markets. When a country is being sanctioned and faces troubled times its  assets are likely to be sold at a discount.

Over the past several months Russian investors have been purchasing massive amounts of international stocks. Showing a particular appetite for FANGS. The latter is an acronym for “Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google,” a term that signifies high performing tech stocks. This is being done to secure their investments and limit their shortfall at home. For example, since the beginning of the year, the RTSI index has lost 7.6% whilst at the same time the S&P has gained over 5.4%. Simultaneously, last week the U.S has slapped new sanctions both on Russia and Turkey. The latter is a major trading partner of Russia. This has again led to a fall in the Russia markets, and a greater decrease in the ruble’s value.

During a meeting, earlier this week Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov confessed his astonishment at the U. S’s decision to sanction a NATO partner, and host to a major U.S military base. He argued that such tactics were likely to push countries to other non-U.S. currencies. The use of the U.S dollar, he stated in a joint statement with Turkish officials, is likely to start declining as nations witness the unpredictability of U. S’s actions. Especially when supposed U.S. allies are also the target of them. As we have said in last week’s issue, the U.S has also barred a French aviation company from purchasing specific technologies. This is forcing nations to purchase U.S. armament products. As to the Russian economy, these new sanctions could in effect force the country of having a new rate hike, the first since 2014.

As we have said in the past, over the first part of the year Russia dropped a large part of its holdings in U.S treasuries, down to just about 14.9bn$. This has in turn taken Russia off the list of principal debt holders. As sanctions hit Turkey, they proceeded with the same actions, and sold off part of their U.S treasury holdings. Simultaneously, analysts at the Council for Foreign Relations have pointed out that there appeared to be a direct correlation between Russia’s downsizing of U.S treasuries and a similar amount transferred to both Belgium and the Cayman Islands. The latter was done in the form of bonds and other financial assets.

Now if you are an investor in Russia, you would naturally consider investing into metal and mining companies. These companies have had massive profits, and are based on solid business principles. Here again, this week you would have been losing though. An aid to Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed a plan that would collect additional taxes on these firms. These taxes would allow the Russian state to fill its coffers with an additional combined amount of 7.5bn$. The 14 large companies that are in the cross-hairs of these new taxes include Norilsk Nickel (MCX:GMKN), Severstal (MCX:CHMF) and Sibur. Oleg Deripaska’s firms are not found on the list, perhaps the Kremlin believes that his companies are in deep enough water to be furthered crippled.

On the other hand, just as these firms are facing new taxes, Deripaska’s EN+ (LSE:ENPL) and Rusal (MCX:RUAL)have announced their intentions to domicile certain parts of their businesses in Russia. In late July, the lower house of parliament voted a new law that will oversee the creation of special administrative regions in Russia.  Russky Island in the South Japanese Sea and Oktyabrsk Island in Kaliningrad, have been the chosen two regions. These islands will be the equivalent of other ‘offshore’ designated areas around the world. They will provide international firms registered there with a special taxation system (e.g. the non-taxation of income perceived via dividends) and a different regulatory body. This would enable firms registered there to get a reprieve from taxes, and benefit from rules that enable them to not disclose their financial ties to other players. Rules that allow them to keep things under a veil of secrecy.

As we are seeing it, Russia is going in various directions and this is likely to cause concern amongst investors worldwide. That being said, investors with an appetite for potential high-yield investments, should keep a close eye in Russian equities. Their stock prices remain low despite their financial strength due to an increase in commodity prices.

Read more: 

"Russian's Buy Apple, Amazon as Sanctions Push Investment Overseas," by Anna Baraulina for Bloomberg. 

"Sanctions Risk May Prompt First Russian Rate Hike Since 2014," by Olga Tanas. 

"Russia's Lavrov Accuses U.S. of 'Abandoning Diplomacy' During Turkey Talks," by the Financial Times. 

"Russia Leaves U.S. Debt Intact After $81 Billion Retreat," by Natasha Doff for Bloomberg.  

"Turkey Follows Russia in Dropping Off Top U.S. Creditor List," by Sarah McGregor for Bloomberg.  

"Russia's Richest Lose $3.1 Billion as Tax Plan Hits Shares," Alexander Sazonov for Bloomberg. 

"Rusal says Board Backs Change of Domicile to Russia," by Reuters staff. 

"EN+ Considers Move to Russia's New Offshore Zone," by Reuters staff. 

Picture

Are the Next “Rockefellers” Russian?

What do the Rockefeller, Bolloré and Rothschild families have in common?

Beyond the fact that they are old families with immense family fortunes, these families have done something that the Vanderbilt’s for instance did not achieve. They managed to transfer their massive wealth from one generation to the next. As we sit in 2018, we are on the verge of the largest wealth transfer in history, going to the ‘baby boomers’, and indirectly to many millennials as well.

This transfer will be the single largest transfer ever to occur. In places like the U.S, France, the U.K and other western countries, there is an old culture of how to transfer wealth. Basically, to optimize costs and taxes. In places with newer less ‘educated’ fortunes, such as Russia, this is not the case. Ultra High Net Worth individuals in Russia, acquired their vast wealth in a very short span of time (in sometimes obscure fashions), and only began to do so in the 90’s after the fall of the Soviet Union. For the past 20 years, these people have been working to acquire wealth in all of its possible forms and styles.

These entrepreneurs were working to protect their assets, be it by consolidating or expanding. Always remaining at the helm of their businesses, and not delegating it to boards or family type offices. These businessmen were not professionally trained professionals (e.g. MBA types like the creators of this newsletter). Instead, they are people who emerged from a certain chaos, and as such work well with chaos. They often have a multitude of interests around the globe. However, when your wealth is tied to your core company, and you often treat its funds as if they were private, problems can arise.

In Russia, however, some of the businessmen behind large fortunes are maturing in their view of wealth maintenance. Hence, the former Communist powerhouse nation is finally seeing the emergence of family offices, be they for one family or multiple. As these wealthy individuals begin consolidating their fortunes and start to act like their western forefathers, we will finally get a clearer vision of their assets. As family offices start taking shape, these tycoons are actually moving their whole cast forward by decades, and will spur further global economic development by becoming ‘smart money’ (e.g. money invested by people with expert knowledge). 

In order to professionalize their future inheritors, Russian tycoons have been sending their offspring to various boarding schools and universities around the world. This will in principle teach them how to behave in accordance with their inherited position. It will be interesting to see how this transfer of wealth from direct control to family offices will operate. Even more so, to see how this younger generation is going to run the family business. Considering that they have been educated, and now operate with western manners.

A key difference between wealthy Russian families from western families is their desire to have a liquid portfolio. Russian’s still believe ‘cash is king’ for better or for worse. An explanation for this could be that having a liquid portfolio ensures your ability to move assets swiftly from one location to another. In Russia, there still remains elements of the “wild 90’s.” Thus the heads of these fortunes need safeguards against a total loss.  Safeguards that cash and cash like financial instruments can provide. These entrepreneurs have lived through some very tough periods, and therefore prefer a certain level of control. Hence, they will always be skeptical of certain investment vehicles.

How will the world handle and receive these new “Rockefellers”? Time will tell.

If the West accepts them (and it will most likely) these new princes and princesses of industry are likely to make a cultural, political and economic splash. One that is going to ripple throughout western culture, and perhaps lessen the current "New Cold War" dynamic.

Read more: 

"Rich Russians Start Family Offices as Heirs Lie in Wait," by Alexander Sazonov for Bloomberg. 

"Hiding Russian Money was Easy. Quitting was Harder," by Max Colchester and Margot Patrick for the Wall Street Journal. 

Feel like commenting on our service or on what you just read? Want to make a suggestion? Got any complaints? Shoot us an email at [email protected]. Visit www.rossiyascan.com​ to signup!